| Introduction | All questions were answered completely and rationales for the answers were clearly stated | All questions were answered completely, but rationales for the all the answers were not clearly stated. | Not all questions were answered completely, or greater than 2 rationales for the all answers were not clearly stated | All questions were not answered completely | |
| Task | All areas of the task were addressed and handled with a high degree of sophistication. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought. | At least one area of the task was not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a great deal of thought. | At least two areas of the task were not addressed. The plan followed by the team demonstrated a moderate level of thought. | The task is incomplete and/or it is apparent that little effort went into the development of the task. | |
| Process: Teamwork | It is evident that a mutual effort and cohesive unit created the final product. | The team worked well together, but could have utilized each other's skills to a better degr | The team had problems working together. Little collaboration occurred. | The final product is not the result of a collaborative effort. The group showed no evidence of collaboration. | |
| Process: Originality | The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a high degree of originality. | The ideas expressed by the body of work are mostly original. The group may have improved upon a previous idea. | The ideas expressed by the body of work demonstrate a low degree of originality. | There were no original ideas expressed in this project. | |
| Grammar, Format , and Spelling | The final body of work was free of grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. | The final body of work had 1 error related to either grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. | The final body of work had 3-5 grammar, spelling, and formatting errors. | The final body of work had major grammar, spelling, and formatting errors | |
| | | | | Total Points - | |