|
Attribute
|
1 - Not Acceptable
|
2 - Below Expectations
|
3 - Meets Expectations
|
4 - Exceeds Expectations
|
Score
|
Effective use of Visual Aids (VA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity and readability of Visual Aids
|
not clear or unreadable
|
difficult to read
|
clear and readable
|
superior clarity and readability
|
|
|
Use of space on VA
|
VA unreadable because too crowded
|
too little or too much information of VA
|
appropriate amount of information on VA
|
VAs very well designed
|
|
|
Lettering readable
|
font unreadable
|
font too small
|
font readable
|
|
|
|
Color, over- or under-use (if used)
|
colors too hard to distinguish, colors do not project well
|
poor choice and use of colors
|
primary/easily distinguishable colors
|
use of color enhances clarity of presentation
|
|
|
Wording concise
|
slides full of text
|
slides too wordy
|
slides appropriate
|
|
|
|
Appropriate amount of information per VA
|
so much or so little information per VA to make VA useless
|
too much information per VA, missing information such as labels on axis
|
appropriate level of information per slide
|
|
|
|
Effective use of Software to prepare visual aids
|
sloppy, format for graphs not followed
|
poor, some format errors
|
appropriate, all formats followed
|
superior clarity, all formats followed
|
|
Presentation organization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logical order of topics
|
totally disjointed, no organization
|
some items presented out of order
|
organization as per guidelines
|
superior organization enhances communication
|
|
|
Appropriate use of time: Not too long /short
|
far too long or far too short
|
somewhat too long or too short
|
appropriate length
|
|
|
|
Complete "story" told
|
story missing, no story told
|
story incomplete
|
complete story told
|
|
|
|
Introduction and overview: Problem stated
|
problem not stated,
|
problem poorly stated
|
problem clearly stated
|
problem clearly stated, good perspective on problem shown
|
|
|
Constraints and assumptions explained
|
missing constraints or assumptions
|
some constants or assumptions not stated
|
constraints and assumptions stated
|
constraints and assumptions clearly stated and explained
|
|
|
Methodology or approach: coverage appropriate (if applicable)
|
methodology not explained
|
methodology unclear
|
methodology clear
|
theoretical development methodology so clear as not to require questioning
|
|
|
Problem solution
|
problem not solved or solution not explained
|
problem solution fuzzy
|
most of problem solution explained
|
problem solution superior or beyond expectations
|
|
|
Conclusions/Recommendations: Significance explained
|
inadequate conclusions or recommendations, or conclusion and recommendations not based on facts presented
|
present, but not logical, significance not explained
|
present, logical, significance clearly explained
|
present, logical, superior explanations of significance and relevance
|
|
Group Presentation (if applicable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even division of effort
|
one person clearly dominates or did not contribute
|
apparent uneven distribution of effort
|
even division of effort
|
each member made a significant contribution
|
|
|
Interaction between team members
|
it is clear that solution did not result from good team interaction
|
poor interaction between team members apparent
|
good teamwork
|
clearly team functioned well, product clearly exceeds sum of parts
|
|
|
All members of group understand solution
|
clearly at least one member unaware of solution/strategy
|
unclear that all members understand solution and methodology
|
all members understand complete solution and methodology
|
all members understand solution, what they did, and what team members did
|
|
Presentation Mechanics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice volume, enunciation, speed
|
unintelligible or had to
|
voice hard to hear, words slurred or voice trails off, spoke too slow or too fast, monotone with little emphasis
|
voice clearly heard, words clearly enunciated, did not speak too slowly or too rapidly
|
voice projected very well, clear enunciation, did not speak too slowly or rapidly
|
|
|
Hesitations, other voice habits
|
presentation full of hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.
|
some hesitations, ums, ahs, etc.
|
clear, continuous presentation, perhaps a few ums, ahs, etc.
|
superior presentation, free of ums, ahs, etc.
|
|
|
Distracting mannerisms
|
presentation full of distracting mannerisms such as giggling
|
some distracting mannerisms
|
no distracting mannerisms
|
superior presentation
|
|
|
Maintaining eye contact
|
no eye contact at all
|
poor eye contact &endash; looking down or at screen significant portion of time
|
maintained eye contact other than quick glances at screen
|
maintained eye contact with all segments of the audience
|
|
|
Poise
|
clearly unsure, nervous, confused
|
at times appears unsure, nervous, confused
|
composed at all times
|
exudes/convey confidence
|
|
|
Body language
|
immobile, hands in pockets, or blocked screen
|
didn't always indicate how material on VA was related to presentation
|
consistently used gestures to coordinate oral and visual presentation
|
excellent use gestures to provide emphasis
|
|
Response to Questions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct / evasive
|
non-responsive
|
evasive or inaccurate
|
clear and direct
|
very clear and complete
|
|
|
Complete
|
nonexistent
|
incomplete
|
complete
|
complete and enhancing result and communication
|
|
|
Appropriate participation (for groups/if applicable)
|
clearly at least one member unable to respond
|
not all members participate appropriately
|
all members participate appropriately
|
all members can answer questions on all aspects of presentation
|
|