TeacherWeb

Practice Based Learning - Quality Improvement



Top Divider

 

Quality at SBH

8/2004:  NCEP Updates Adult Treatment Panel Guidelines since 2001.
         LDL cholesterol less than 100 md/dl and less than 70 for
         those at high risk (DM, smokers, poorly controlled HBP,
         metabolic syndrom, prvious MI)

8/2004:  NYS DOH QARR measures:
         Breast cancer screening
         Chlamydia Screening (16-25)
         Domprehensive DM Care for poorly controlled
         Asthma:  appropriate medications 
         Controlling HBP

2004:  Quality Assurance Department:  x3914, 6408
       Josephine Jalandoni, QAC RN (Joji)
       Lulu Ibanez, PA    

Grand Rounds by Dr. Danial Buff (who interviewed Dr. Swango)
  "Two wrongs don't make a right."  The second wrong is in not reporting
       the first)
  IOM says there is something wrong with the system, in "To Err is Human" 
       indicates that there are 44-98,000 deaths/year.
  A "Quality Gap" refers to standards not being met (e.g., didn't give 
       beta blocker to post-MI patient), versus an "error".
  80% of errors result from communication problems (e.g., attending to
       attending, resident to attending...)
  Medication errors ("ADRs") - 28% of ADRs are errors.
       ADRs are high in patients transferred from NH (dig, coumadin)
  If survey patients about errors, they will report a high number.****
  Six Sigma refers to error rate of less than 3.4 per 10*6
    "Safety is job one."  Lee Iacocca
       A culture of safety that is non-punitive - do not focus on the
       individual - focus on the system:  standardize
          In the 1980's, anesthesia solved the sandarization problem
          and got to 5.4 errors per million (about 5 sigma).
            JCAHO stepped in for patient safety; but now also need to
              show performance improvement (e.g. restraints)
            DOH-ACGME work hours (European Union: 56 -> 48 hrs/wk)
            Feds:  national guidelines for quality errors  (electronic
                   record and Rx writing).
        Now the government has Quality Measures via CMS (via IPRO) and
            will publish the results for AMI-CHF-CAP, although we do not
            yet know if this is decreasing errors.  In other words, does
            a "corrective action" cause a different, new problem?
               For example, NYS DOH publishes Mortality Data since 1994 
               corrected for risk (but now angiographers are avoiding
               risky patients).   So improving quality but limiting care.

        What is the process of Performance Improvement (PI)?
            Identify a Department or Individual "issue".
            Investigate cause of the Department or Individual issue.
                  That is, perform a Root Cause Analysis (RCA).
            Develop a "corrective action".
            Then monitor the corrective action.

        Example of a PI project:
            Clinic:  pap, ppd, A1c, PSA > 50 yo  
            Handwashing by swabbing resident hands at GR!  
            Reviewing all deaths and looking for errors
            Routine screen of 20 charts for compliance with
                 quality indicators (aiming for 90% compliance - but
                 we don't live near Walgreens). 
            Use of D50 as reflection of hypoglycemia
            Use of Lovonox in patients with a decreased GFR.  
                 Then need to monitor the corrective action (& "Think!)     

4/2005:  Dr. Simeon Schwartz  
         An alternative name for PBLI (practice-based learning & improvement)
         is Clinical-based Practice Improvement
         -When doctors heard the 1999 IOM Report they said, "Not me".
         -Now is not unlike 1787 right before the French monarche fell.

         -We are now seeing "Group-based Quality Improvement Projects".
         -When we are paid, should quality be part of the product?
         -We are moving from the solo physician craftsman (similar to
          the gun maker craftsmen of the pre-industrial revolution)
          to interlocking parts (e.g. new guns, fire department hoses).
          The airplane that crashed in DC several years ago had only been
          de-iced once.  This lead to a change in the system.   Imagine if
          you had to think about how to prepare the plane each time you
          took off.  So NCQA has a checklist of items that need to be
          reviewed:  HbA1c, eye exam, podiatris, microalbumin, lipids, BP
            At SBH, Dr Patel has developed a list for DM
          When things do not go as they should, they are analyzed by
            Root Cause Analysis (RCA).  Deing the plane.
          If a pilot uses a pre-flight checklist, can't we use a DM
            checklist?
          So we use a process with self-assessment and review.  But what
            about "human" factors, such as sleep, emotion?
            So, in additiion of process/procedure factors, there are also
             human factors.  
          What if the human makes a mistake?  Should we use the 'castration'
             method of improvement?  For example, a resident gives chemo to
             treat sickle cell disease, but the patient does not have S/S.
             Perhaps we should modify the system (and include computer
               decision support).  
          An example of process improvement in the blood bank is the use of
               the wrist band.  To look at "quality", we might need to
               look at both Outcomes Measures as well as Process Measures.
                            Death post-CABG              Pat. had mammogram
                                                         Tracked pts on Vioxx

          This brings us to "Pay for Performance" and "six sigma".
          Sigma is a standard deviation.  Hewlett Packard noted that
            1/1000 chips was defective and they wanted to improve this to
            1/10000     However, Japanese manager mistook this for
            1/100,000 (=six sigma)
               To get from 1/1000 to 1/100,000, the Japanese engineer 
               realized he would need to take dust, temperature, a re-
               engineer the whole chip making process.  
                -Quality does not begin with the workers
                -quality begins from the leaders
                -Quality needs to be measrued, eg. nosocomial ICU infections
                     on a montly basis
                -Six Sigma is cultural and conceptural
                -Physician is the captain of the health care team - need 
                     more than an individual
                -At Cornell, Antibiotics for CAP is only 70%:  there are
                     preocess & leadershipp problems.  
                -Might look at mortality post CABG or readmit rates.
            
                -Doing the right thing makes a difference:
                 Inhaled Steroids in asthma causes LOS to go from 7 -> 2
                -So MD compensation based on performance:
                    Process, Quality, Outcomes (helped by technology)
                             Clinical Practice Guidelines 
                            เฉ˜๊ž‰์šฅ Decision Support 
                                (The Craftsman vs the Team)

Bottom Divider

TeacherWeb
Last Modified: Tuesday, January 13, 2009
©2012 TeacherWeb, Inc.