NewsFlash


 
C. Williams/Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency

Barbicambarus simmonsi. The newly discovered, quite large, crayfish.

Barbicambarus simmonsi. The newly discovered, quite large, crayfish.
C. Williams/Tennessee Wildlife Resource Agency

Barbicambarus simmonsi. The newly discovered, quite large, crayfish.

"A new species of giant crayfish [has] literally crawled out from under a rock in Tennessee, proving that large new species of animals can be found in highly populated and well-explored places," Reuters reports.

Researchers Christopher Taylor and Guenter Schuster reveal the discovery in the latest issue of the Proceeding of the Biological Society of Washington (it costs $10 to buy the article). The Barbicambarus simmonsi is about 5 inches long — double the length of most crayfish in the region.

Taylor, from the University of Illinois, and Schuster, from Eastern Kentucky University, heard in the summer of 2009 about the possibility that a new species had been spotted in southern Tennessee by a scientist with the Tennessee Valley Authority. They headed to the area in October that year. And they almost didn't come up with anything.

 

The University of Illinois news bureau writes that:

"With two other biologists, Taylor and Schuster scoured the creek for more specimens. After two hours of turning over boulders and kicking up the sediment to flush the crayfish into their seine, the researchers had found nothing out of the ordinary.

" 'We had worked so hard and long that we were ready to give up and find another site,' Schuster said. 'And we saw this big flat boulder underneath a bridge and so we said, OK. Let's flip this rock, just for the heck of it; this will be our last one. And sure enough, that's where we got the first specimen.' It was a big male, about twice the size of any other crayfish they had seen that day."

Taylor told us today that "we were elated, jumping for joy," when the first of the two crayfish they ended up finding that day crawled out. The scientists proved that they had something new with DNA tests and after studying a ridge and unique spine between the creatures' eyes that the other species in the genus do not have.

Most North American crayfish, he adds, live no more than three or four years and occasionally grow to 4 or 4 1/2 inches long (from the tip of the body to the tip of the tail). The two discovered in 2009, he estimates, were 4 to 5 years old and could be part of the largest species of crayfish in North America.

Taylor and Schuster have each discovered other new species of creatures before, but this one, says Taylor, is special because it wasn't found "in a very difficult-to-access habitat like a cave. ... This was a stream and region that had been searched."

And the attention he and Schuster have gotten in the past 24 hours, says Taylor, "has been wild."

Barbicambarus simmonsi, by the way, gets its name from TVA scientist Jeffrey Simmons — the guy who spotted what turned out to be the new species.

 
 L. Brian Stauffer/UI News Bureau

The new species, Barbicambarus simmonsi (left) is more than twice the size of typical crayfish found in the same creek.

The new species, Barbicambarus simmonsi (left) is more than twice the size of typical crayfish found in the same creek.
L. Brian Stauffer/UI News Bureau

The new species, Barbicambarus simmonsi (left) is more than twice the size of typical crayfish found in the same creek.






 

2010-11 Tennessee Deer Harvest Sees Small Increase

NASHVILLE --- Tennessee’s 2010-11 deer harvest numbers saw a slight increase over those of the previous year, Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency harvest reports have indicated.
 
As harvest numbers continued to trickle into the agency through January, Tennessee hunters harvested 162,465 deer beginning with the archery season in late September an increase of 644 from last year.
 
Giles County was the top harvest county with 5,236. Henry County was second with 5,096 followed by Hardeman County 4,657, Fayette County 4,730, Lincoln County 4,380, Franklin County 3,940, Maury County 3,607, Montgomery County 3,523, Weakley County 3,369, and Carroll County 3,071 to complete the top 10. A harvest increase was seen in 54 of Tennessee’s 95 counties during 2010-11.
 
The TWRA is soliciting comments for its 2011-12 hunting seasons’ regulations. This is an opportunity for the public to share ideas and concerns about hunting regulations with TWRA staff.
 
 Public comments will be considered by TWRA’s Wildlife Division staff and may be presented as proposals for regulation changes. Comments may be submitted by mail to: 2011-12 Hunting Season Comments, TWRA, Wildlife Management Division, P.O. 40747, Nashville, TN 37204 or emailed to twra.comment@tn.gov. Please include “Hunting Season Comments” on the subject line of emailed submissions. 
 
The comment period concerning the 2011-12 hunting season regulations will be open until Feb. 24, 2011. 

---TWRA---


 

 


 

 

Dr. Witek Nazarewicz draws the blueprint for what may just
prove to be a brand new element





Witek Nazarewiczis an explorer, of sorts. His
tools are math and physics, his terrain is the nuclear landscape, and his
mission is to find the "magic nuclei." He has recently come closer to his goal
by providing the mathematical calculations for what might turn out to be the
newest additions to the periodic table: elements 114, 116, and 118.

Dr. Nazarewicz is a theoretical physicist who lends his expertise to both the
University of Tennessee and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. His specialty is
the nucleus, the bundle of neutrons and protons that serves as the nerve center
of all atoms and contains most of their mass. When the Curies discovered 100
years ago that not all nuclei are stable (radioactivity), a new era began for
science. Physicists began to wonder what were the limits of charge and mass for
a nucleus. By playing with the numbers of protons and neutrons, they could
synthesize elements in laboratories. But while naturally occurring elements are
long-lived, the unstable lab-created variety had much shorter lifetimes, quickly
falling victim to decay. Thus the challenge for theorists like Dr. Nazarewicz
was to draw some sort of blueprint to map out the uncharted territory of the
nuclear landscape (or "terra incognita," as he calls it) to create heavy
elements, or, as he says, "see how far you can go in atomic mass; how heavy you
can make the stuff." For the past several years, he and his colleagues from
Warsaw and Brussels have been designing mathematical models to do just that. As
it turns out, another group of physicists was conducting an experiment that
would fit those blueprints quite well.



 

Dr. Nazarewicz's illustration of the nuclear landscape, which compares the
region of unknown nuclei to unexplored territory in Africa (terra
incognita).


A New Addition to the Periodic Table? Maybe.

During November and December of 1998, scientists from theJoint Institute for Nuclear Research in Russia
and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory were busy running experiments to see just how
"heavy" they could go. For 40 days, they bombarded plutonium targets with
calcium ions, creating 1018collisions. Of all those, one decay chain
stood out as a candidate to be a new element, number 114. The chain had a much
longer lifetime than the last element, 112, discovered in 1996. When Dr.
Nazarewicz and his team heard of the project, they provided the experimentalists
with their mathematical models and found remarkable agreement between the theory
and experiment. In April of this year,another team from Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory and Oregon State University
performed similar
experiments, using lead targets and krypton ions. The results showed three decay
chains, indicating not only element 114 but elements 116 and 118 as well. Robert
Smolanczuk of Poland's Soltan Institute provided the initial theory calculations
for this work, which was also supported by the calculations by S. Cwiok
(Warsaw/JIHIR), Dr. Nazarewicz, and P.H. Heenen (Brussels/JIHIR).

Although he is quick to acknowledge the data are not 100 percent conclusive,
Dr. Nazarewicz is certainly encouraged by the evidence his work provides for the
possible existence of element 114. These are "calculations that greatly support
the identification made in experimental papers," he said. The work is being
chronicled in the scientific literature, as the experimental group submitted a
paper in March 1999 to Physical Review Letters, to be followed by another paper
by Dr. Nazarewicz's theory group. A second experimental paper, on a second
isotope of element 114, has also been submitted to Nature by the Dubna group.
The Berkeley/Oregon paper was submitted to the same journal in June 1999. Below
is what the periodic table looks like with the possible inclusion of elements
114, 116, and 118.


 

Gaining Ground on the "Magic Nuclei"

Dr. Nazarewicz explained that what makes this work so exciting is that it
demonstrates that scientists are getting closer to the superheavy "magic
nuclei," longest-lived super-heavy elements. Scientists began making predictions
about these elements some 30 years ago. In 1981, Bohrium (element 107) became
the first member of the superheavy class. Since then, Dr. Nazarewicz explained
that subsequent element discoveries are "slowly approaching greater shell
stability," as their lifetimes have gone from microseconds to several minutes.
As explained in the 1999 National Research Council report, Nuclear Physics: the
Core of Matter, the Fuel of Stars, "superheavies" are important because they
would provide "crucial information on relativistic effects in atomic physic and
quantum chemistry."

The superheavies represent the fourth period of radioactive element discovery
in scientific history. The first (1896-1940) was characterized by the Curies'
work and the discovery of polonium. The Manhattan Project marked the second
period (1940-1952), when plutonium became part of the periodic table. The third
period (1955-1974) witnessed a Cold War competition of sorts between Russian
laboratories at Dubna and American laboratories in Berkeley to discover new
elements. The fourth period (1974-1996) has been dominated by work in Darmstadt,
Germany, which has been responsible for six new elements since 1981. The last
three (110, 111, and 112) are still
unnamed, due to the "politics involved," Dr. Nazarewicz said. Because of
disputes over the proper name for these new elements, the International Union
for Pure and Applied Chemistry has devised a Latin system to give each a
temporary name based on its individual numbers. So for now, 114 is technically
ununquadium, 116 is ununhexium, and 118 is ununoctium.

Although more experimentation will be necessary to prove the elements'
existence, Dr. Nazarewicz will turn his attention back to drawing new blueprints
of the nuclear landscape in search of magic nuclei.

"I'm a theorist," he says with a laugh. "I don't smash atoms."




Related Sites:


  • A popular write-up on the superheavies from the recent National Academy of
    Sciences report:http://pompeii.nap.edu/books/0309062764/html/index.html
    (Chapter 3, The Structure of Nuclei)

     


  • The GSI (Darmstadt) www page contains useful information on the discovery of
    elements Z=110-112:http://www.gsi.de/z112e.htmland on the
    heaviest elements in general:http://www-aix.gsi.de/~demo/wunderland/englisch/Kapitel_02.html

     


  • LBNL 118 element page:http://user88.lbl.gov/element118.html

     


  • Dubna WWW page:http://www.jinr.ru/





    This page was last updated August 17, 2000.
    Please send comments
    tocal@utk.edu.




  •